Samuel C. Straight

<< Back to Attorneys

Sam Straight is a shareholder at Ray Quinney & Nebeker in the Firm's litigation section. His practice focuses on intellectual property litigation, including patent, trademark, trade secret and copyright matters from pre-litigation enforcement through trial. He works with high-technology and other companies in the protection of their intellectual property rights, and defense against claims of infringement. Mr. Straight also represents clients in a wide variety of other commercial litigation, including securities, shareholder derivative, real property, and appellate litigation matters. He also has extensive experience with litigation involving the direct selling industry.

Mr. Straight also advises clients regarding compliance with federal and state economic regulations, including Federal Trade Commission regulations, and export control and economics sanctions regulations. In addition, he is a registered lobbyist in Utah and has represented clients in matters before a variety of legislative bodies and administrative agencies.

Mr. Straight is the Hiring Partner and chair of the Firm's Recruiting Committee.

Mr. Straight was recognized in Chambers USA in Intellectual Property Law, and maintains an AV Preeminent (4.6) rating with Martindale-Hubbell, which is the highest rating awarded to attorneys for professional competence and ethics. He has also been selected for inclusion in Mountain States Super Lawyers in the category of Intellectual Property Litigation. Mr. Straight has been included on the list of The Best Lawyers in America in Intellectual Property Law and has also been voted by his peers throughout the state as one of Utah’s “Legal Elite” in the category of Intellectual Property (as published in Utah Business Magazine).

REPRESENTATIVE CASES

  • Successfully represented Microsoft in numerous actions to enforce its trademarks and copyrights in the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah. See, e.g., Microsoft Corporation v. MBC et al., 2:00-CV-217; Microsoft Corporation v. Softwaremedia.com et al., 2:10-CV-526.
  • Successfully represented the United States Olympic Committee and the Salt Lake Organizing Committee for the Olympic Winter Games of 2002 in a number of actions enforcing their trademarks and copyrights in the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah, including use of John Doe seizure orders. See, e.g., USOC et al. v. Doe, 2:02-CV-105; USOC v. Quiksilver et al., 2:02-CV-57.
  • DigEcor, Inc. v. e.Digital Corporation, 2:06-CV-437, U.S. District Court for the District of Utah, obtained judgment in favor of e.Digital as lead trial counsel on all claims asserted at trial, including judgment dismissing claims for over $9 million in damages; also obtained summary judgment in favor of e.Digital against claims to enjoin e.Digital’s business.
  • CytoSport, Inc. v. Vital Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 617 F. Supp. 2d 1051 (E.D. Cal. 2009), aff’d, 348 Fed. Appx. 288 (9th Cir. 2009), U.S. District Court for Eastern District of California, obtained Preliminary Injunction, affirmed by the Ninth Circuit, on behalf of the makers of Muscle Milk in trademark and trade dress infringement action.
  • Hospital Systems Corp. v. Novarad Corp., 2:07-CV-389, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, successfully defended Novarad against patent infringement claims.
  • IOSTAR Corporation v. Stuart et al., 1:07-CV-133, U.S. District Court for the District of Utah, obtained summary judgment in favor of client dismissing with prejudice claims of trade secret misappropriation and obtained award of attorneys’ fees.
  • Hansen Beverage Company v. CytoSport, Inc., 2:09-CV-31, U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, successfully defended CytoSport against trademark and trade dress infringement claims.
  • Tahitian Noni International, Inc. v. Thomas H. Thornton et al., Civil No. 100104550, Fourth Judicial District Court, Utah County, obtained Preliminary Injunction against misappropriation of trade secrets and solicitation of network marketing distributors.
Education 

Duke University, J.D., L.L.M. in transnational and comparative law, 1996

  • cum laude

Georgetown University, B.S.F.S., International Affairs, 1991

  • cum laude
Prior Professional Experience 
  • Associate, Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, Washington, D.C., September 1997 - March 1999
  • Clerkship, Hon. Stephen H. Anderson, U.S. Court of Appeals, 10th Circuit, September 1996-August 1997
Admitted to Practice 
  • Utah State Bar, 1996
  • District of Columbia Bar, 1998
  • U. S. Court of Appeals, 10th Circuit
  • U.S. District Court, District of Utah
  • Court of International Trade
Professional and Civic Activities 
  • Member, Utah Capital Investment Board (November 2011-present)
  • Member, Board of Directors, The Leonardo (February 2010-present)
  • Adjunct Professor of Business Law, Westminster College (2009-present)
  • Chair, Intellectual Property Section, Utah State Bar (2006-2007)
  • Member, Salt Lake City Community Development Advisory Board (2001-2006)
Publications and Presentations 
  • GATT & NAFTA: Marrying Effective Dispute Settlement and Sovereignty of the Fifty States, 45 DUKE LAW JOURNAL 216 (1995)
http://www.chambersandpartners.com/GetRankingImage.aspx?it=4&p=184&c=65979&cp=330395
http://www.bestlawyers.com/images/showlogo.aspx?lawyer_ID=65697&size=S&logo=REG
Recent News
Jan 06, 2012

Forty-two Ray Quinney & Nebeker attorneys are named "Utah's Legal Elite," an impressive list

Sep 13, 2011
Forty-one Ray Quinney & Nebeker attorneys have been selected for the 2012 edition of The Best Lawyers in America for excellence in their respective practice areas.
Jun 29, 2011
Ray Quinney & Nebeker is pleased to announce that thirty-two attorneys have been selected as 2011 Super Lawyers, Mountain States Edition and Rising Stars. Only the top five percent of attorneys in each state are honored as Super Lawyers in this annual list, and Rising Star selection is limited to just 2.5 percent of eligible attorneys.

AV® Preeminent ™ and BV® Distinguished™ are certification marks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc., used in accordance with the Martindale-Hubbell certification procedures, standards and policies. Martindale-Hubbell is the facilitator of a peer review rating process. Ratings reflect the anonymous opinions of members of the Bar and the Judiciary. Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings fall into two categories - legal ability and general ethical standards.