Mark W. Pugsley

<< Back to Attorneys

Mark Pugsley is a trial lawyer who primarily handles securities and investment disputes. He is the Chair of the Securities Litigation Group at Ray Quinney & Nebeker. Mr. Pugsley was the Chair of the Securities Section of the Utah State Bar in 2006 and has been a member of the Advisory Board for the Utah Division of Securities. He is a founder and member of the Utah Securities Association. He practiced for several years in Los Angeles, California before moving to Utah, and holds active licenses to practice law in both California and Utah.

The majority of Mr. Pugsley's work involves civil securities litigation, regulatory investigations, FINRA arbitrations, investment advisor disputes, and receivership litigation for parties on all sides of these matters. He has handled many securities arbitrations and frequently defends corporations, officers, accountants, brokerage firms and brokers in investigations, administrative actions and civil litigation brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Utah Division of Securities, and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA, formerly NASD). He has been involved in internal investigations for publicly-traded companies, and advises companies and brokerage firms on disclosure and compliance issues.

Mr. Pugsley maintains an AV Preeminent (5.0) rating with Martindale-Hubbell, which is the highest rating awarded to attorneys for professional competence and ethics. Mr. Pugsley is listed in The Best Lawyers in America Tier 1 in Utah for Securities Law, and in Mountain States Super Lawyers in the area of Securities Litigation. He was recently recognized as a "Highly Recommended" lawyer in Utah by Benchmark Plaintiff and has been listed by Utah Business Magazine as one of Utah’s “Legal Elite” in the category of Civil Litigation in every year since the list's inception in 2004.

Mr. Pugsley maintains a blog relating to securities fraud issues here in Utah: UtahSecuritiesFraud.com

REPRESENTATIVE SECURITIES LITIGATION

  • Successfully obtained a ruling that establishes who is a "customer" of a brokerage firm in a selling away case. Lincoln Financial v. HealthRight Partners, USDC Case No. 2:09CV650.
  • Successfully defended temporary restraining orders sought against several brokers who moved from one brokerage firm to Ameriprise Financial. Merrill Lynch v. Baxter, USDC Case No. 1:09 CV-00045 and Merrill Lynch v. Mecham, USDC Case no. 2:09 CV-00283.
  • Represented multiple defendants in clawback lawsuits brought by the court-appointed receiver in Securities and Exchange Commission v. Vescor Capital Corp., et al. USDC Case 1:08-cv-00012-DB
  • Counsel to USANA in multiple class actions, including a federal case that was dismissed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on July 23, 2008. Ashok Kapur v. USANA Health Sciences, et al. USDC Case No. 2:07-CV-177. Opinion at 2008 WL 2901705.
  • Successfully argued for dismissal of an administrative lawsuit filed by the Utah Division of Securities against a prominent Utah broker-dealer. All claims were dismissed by the ALJ in January of 2008.
  • Litigation counsel to the court-appointed receiver in the SEC enforcement action styled SEC v. Novus Technologies, LLC, et al., USDC Case No. 2:07-CV-235.
  • Representation of USA Securities, USA Commercial Mortgage Company, USA Capital Realty Advisors, USA Capital Diversified Trust Deed Fund, and USA Capital First Trust Deed Fund in multiple federal and state regulatory investigations and related litigation, USBC Case No. BK-S-06-10725 LBR (Nevada)
  • Representation of two former executives for TenFold Corporation in SEC v. Tenfold, USDC Case No. 2:03-CV-442. All claims were dismissed by the SEC in December of 2005
  • Representation of the Utah Educational Savings Plan Trust in an administrative settlement with the SEC, 1933 Act Release No. 8601, August 4, 2005, File No. 3-12004
  • Representation of several defendants in litigation brought by the SEC and the accompanying receivership action captioned SEC v. David Wolfson, et al., USDC Case No. 2:03-CV-0914
  • Representation of several defendants in the SEC enforcement action captioned SEC v. Allen Wolfson, USDC Case No. 2:02-CV-1086
  • Representation of three former Fidelity branch managers in a joint SEC and NYSE investigation, and in one of the cases that went to trial before the NYSE Hearing Board
Education 

Duke University, J.D., 1994

  • Duke Law Journal
  • Jessup Cup International Moot Court Team

Duke University, Sanford Institute of Public Policy, M.A., Public Policy, 1994

University of Utah, B.S., Political Science, 1991

Prior Professional Experience 
  • Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP
  • Jones, Bell, Simpson & Abbott, LLP
Admitted to Practice 
  • Utah State and Federal Courts
  • California State and Federal Courts
  • United States Supreme Court
  • Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals
Professional Affiliations and Memberships 
  • Utah State Bar
  • California State Bar
  • Federal Bar Association
  • American Bar Association
  • Salt Lake County Bar Association
Publications and Presentations 
  • Panelist on Litigation Risk in Today's Economy at the Annual Conference of the Real Estate Investors Securities Association (October 2010)
  • Article in Utah CEO Magazine: The Price of Neglecting Corporate Complaince in the Post-Madoff World (April 2010)
  • Regularly posts updates to the Securities Litigation Group blog: UtahSecuritiesFraud.com
  • Speaker on Private Causes of Action under the Utah Uniform Securities Act, CLE sponsored by the Securities Section of the Utah State Bar (March 2010)
  • Panelist at the Investment Adviser Workshop sponsored by the Utah Division of Securities (June 2009)
  • Editorial: Perils of Investing with Friends and Ward Members as published in the Salt Lake Tribune (December 2008)
  • Approved as a CE provider in Utah, and frequent presenter at continuing education seminars for broker-dealers
  • Moderator of Panel Discussion on Regulatory Enforcement Issues at the 2006 Securities Law Workshop, sponsored by the Securities Section of the Utah State Bar (August 2006)
  • Presentation: "The Regulators are Watching: How to Survive Increasing Securities Regulation and Litigation" before the Salt Lake Estate Planning Council's 2005 Fall Institute
  • Presentation: "Recent 9th and 10th Circuit Securities Decisions" at the Securities Section's Securities Law Workshop (August 2004 and August 2005)
  • Presentation: "NASD Arbitration" at CLE seminar on Securities Practice sponsored by the Utah State Bar (October 2003)
  • Moderator of Panel Discussion on Ethical Issues for Securities Attorneys under SEC Rule 205 at the 26th Annual Securities Law Workshop, sponsored by the Securities Section of the Utah State Bar (August 2003)
  • Speaker at CLE seminar "Stockbroker Fraud in Utah," sponsored by the National Business Institute (October 1999)
  • Article: "Ninth Circuit Confirms the CFTC Does Not Have Jurisdiction Over Off-Exchange Foreign Currency Transactions," Securities Law Roundup, Winter 1997
  • Article: "Brokerage Firm Policies Governing the Use of Internet and E-mail by Associated Persons," Compliance Reporter, Institutional Investor, Inc., March 31, 1997
  • Law Journal Note: Nonsmoking Hiring Policies: Examining the Status of Smokers Under Title I of the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990, 43 Duke Law Journal 1089
http://www.bestlawyers.com/images/showlogo.aspx?lawyer_ID=43422&size=S&logo=REG
Recent News
Jan 06, 2012

Ray Quinney & Nebeker has been recognized in Benchmark Plaintiff 2012: The Definitive Gui

Jan 06, 2012

Forty-two Ray Quinney & Nebeker attorneys are named "Utah's Legal Elite," an impressive list

Sep 13, 2011
Forty-one Ray Quinney & Nebeker attorneys have been selected for the 2012 edition of The Best Lawyers in America for excellence in their respective practice areas.

AV® Preeminent ™ and BV® Distinguished™ are certification marks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc., used in accordance with the Martindale-Hubbell certification procedures, standards and policies. Martindale-Hubbell is the facilitator of a peer review rating process. Ratings reflect the anonymous opinions of members of the Bar and the Judiciary. Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings fall into two categories - legal ability and general ethical standards.